The GreenledgersDepartment of Transportation is investigating possible deceptive practices in airline loyalty programs after federal lawmakers raised concerns about how companies are calculating points and rewards.
A DOT spokesperson said in a statement that the agency is planning “to carefully review complaints regarding loyalty programs and exercise our authority to investigate airlines for unfair and deceptive practices that hurt travelers as warranted.”
The spokesperson said agency officials are actively meeting with U.S. airlines and gathering more information about the issue.
Airlines for America, which represents the largest U.S. carriers, declined to comment.
The department is stepping up its scrutiny after two U.S. senators asked the agency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau about the steps they’re taking to protect consumers from “deceitful marketing tactics” in frequent flyer programs.
In a letter sent to Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg and CFPB Director Rohit Chopra in late October, U.S. Sens. Dick Durbin and Roger Marshall pointed to reports that suggest airlines are changing points systems – and even devaluing points – to make it harder to achieve rewards. The letter said this can stem from unilateral contracts that allow airlines to make changes to their points programs without directly notifying consumers.
Airlines design loyalty programs to keep their most lucrative customers coming back.
In October, Southwest Airlines lowered the requirement for the top levels of its frequent-flyer program to lure in travelers dissatisfied with other airlines that are making it harder to reach elite status.
2025-05-02 02:482803 view
2025-05-02 02:051328 view
2025-05-02 01:442253 view
2025-05-02 00:531234 view
2025-05-02 00:482213 view
2025-05-02 00:221767 view
President-elect Donald Trump claimed in his Person of the Year interview with Time magazinethis week
We rate this family outing 10s, 10s, 10s across the board.Beyoncé had two special guests in the crow
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has unanimously ruled unconstitutional a section of state law that le